involved in transformation vary from case to case, they are often as high as those for demolition and erection of a new build. Sebastian Nitsch, a member of the management board of Austrian firm 6B47 Real Estate Investors, likewise sees no cost benefits of taking the transformation route. In Vienna, 6B47 has so far convert- ed seven office buildings into residential accommodation, including a former post office in the city’s 9th district – marketed as Althanpark. Such measures are, how- ever, beneficial in terms of sustainability, which is currently gaining in importance as a result of the EU Taxonomy and Disclosure Regulation. “In conversions like these, we strip the existing building back to the reinforced concrete skeleton,” explains Nitsch. “Compared to com- plete demolition, this enables us to save resources, reduce the number of truck journeys and cut CO2 emissions.” Other experts also point out that trans- forming existing buildings saves grey energy, something that is now a re- quirement for new builds. Accordingly, the study by bulwiengesa and Union Investment stresses that “transformation properties can be more environmentally friendly and cost effective in the long term than a new build.” There are significant challenges to over- come before any environmental benefits can be realised, however. Nitsch notes that the structural conditions have to be right, particularly room heights, the spacing of pillars and the depth of the building. Fire protection requirements also need to be met. Above all, planning and construction law must permit a change of use. That’s not always the case in Germany, which is why Lars Jähnichen is calling on policymakers to “create the right conditions for conversions.” Restructuring options for a wide variety of first-time uses Ralf-Peter Koschny, senior manager at bulwiengesa, agrees that transforming properties is a complex process. Trans- formation has the best chance of suc- ceeding if the urban environment and A former vodka distillery in Łódź, Poland, has been transformed into Monopolis, a mixed-use complex that combines offices, shops, restaurants, galleries and a fitness centre. stakeholders are taken into account at all stages, he says. The conversions carried out in Vienna show that transformation is not limited to retail properties. Based on the qualitative analysis of German transformation properties performed by bulwiengesa, industrial and office build- ings are more likely to be converted than retail properties. In the Polish city of Łódź, meanwhile, project developer Virako transformed a former vodka distil- lery into Monopolis, a mixed-use complex that combines offices, shops, restaurants, galleries and a fitness centre. The result is so impressive that Monopolis received a MIPIM award in 2020 in the Best Mixed- Use Development category. Gerber, Monopolis, Neue Höfe Herne: it’s no coincidence that in all of these cases the project teams opted for a mix of different uses. According to the study, around fifty percent of transformations are implemented as a mixed-use concept. The reasons are compelling, explains Henrike Waldburg of Union Investment: “Transforming properties creates new opportunities to tap into smart com- plementary uses and user groups and make a valuable contribution towards enhancing the vitality and attractiveness of individual buildings, neighbourhoods • and entire cities.” A 51 percent of German transform- ation properties are in Class A cities. Mixed use is an increasingly popular choice for German transform- ation properties. Study To order a copy, visit ui-link.de/transform- ationsstudie Source: Transformation Properties Market Study, Union Investment and bul- wiengesa, December 2021 places and spaces 01/2022 7 z c i w e i s a k u Ł k e c a J , r e n h c s r a M e e d A / l t n e m t s e v n I i n o n U : s o t o h P